This letter is taken from Sacbee / Opinion / Letters to the Editor.
Letters: Health, privatization, etc.
Published
Re "Conflict is boiling over care / The death of a severely retarded man is the latest flashpoint in a battle between families and the state over its developmental centers," Jan. 1: Donald Santiago's death was tragic and, if it was avoidable, should result in appropriate remedial action. There is a danger, however, of overgeneralizing from such instances to conclude that the state and national movement to provide community living options for people with disabilities is misguided or should be slowed.
By focusing on individual instances, news articles often fail to note that institutionalization is almost never necessary to provide quality care. More than 200,000 Californians with developmental disabilities already live successfully in the community, including people with disabilities as significant as those who remain institutionalized.
Studies comparing those who remain in developmental
centers with those who have moved to the community almost invariably show
improvements in skills and quality of life for the movers. And, significantly,
tragic occurrences are not limited to community homes. Since
We must begin working cooperatively to maximize community integration and inclusion, which for too long has been the goal but still not the reality for several thousand Californians with developmental disabilities.
- Eric Gelber,
Managing Attorney,
Protection & Advocacy Inc.
This well-written article by Clea Benson ("Conflict is boiling over care," Jan. 1) says that community placement of Donald Santiago was necessitated by a Supreme Court decision requiring community living. No such decision was reached by the court.
Actually, a sharply divided court found that individuals in state hospitals should be assessed to determine if they could live in less restrictive settings. Four of the judges rejected this requirement.
Five said it was necessary and should result in the replacement of many individuals into community settings. Implicit in the decision was an assumption by all nine justices that the least restrictive alternative for some individuals was their present setting, i.e. a state hospital.
>From the family's point of view,
-
_____________________________________________________________________
They're our family and friends
Donald Santiago was a son, brother and friend. He is now a
statistic in a long line of unfortunate tragedies plaguing the
Aggressive deinstitutionalization and negligible government
oversight are to blame for these tragedies.
Misinterpretation of the landmark 1999 Supreme Court
Olmstead decision doesn't help. Olmstead does not "require community
living." The court stated, "We emphasize that nothing in the
As taxpayers and as humane beings, we must insist that services for our most vulnerable citizenry be adequately funded with reliable government oversight. The benefactors of our goodwill are the people with mental disabilities who are our relatives, friends and neighbors.
- Mary E. McTernan,
President, Voice of the Retarded
_____________________________________________________________________
Go to: Sacbee / Back to story
This article is protected by copyright and should not be printed or distributed for anything except personal use.
The
Phone:
Copyright © The